CITY OF CREEDMOOR
Apr 11, 2011 ... RESOLUTION OPPOSING LIFTING THE BAN ON URANIUM ... TO THE CITIZENS OF VIRGINIA AND NORTH CAROLINA LIVING IN THE
http://www.cityofcreedmoor.org/vertical/Sites/%7B5DDB58B2-9084-4EC6-99DD-B01786475046%7D/uploads/%7B358E34D4-AE2E-43F7-8657-1A7853EE12FC%7D.PDF
Environmentalists have long been fond of saying that the sun is the only safe nuclear reactor, situated as it is some ninety-three million miles away. ~Stephanie Mills, ed., In Praise of Nature, 1990
Nuclear Power Cycle - Full of CO2
This is a lecture delivered by Dr. Rodolfo John Ortiz Teope on the effects of Nuclear Power Plant, though understanding the basics of the Uranium Cycle.
French Nuclear Power Station Leak
CHAN: And a French nuclear firm says liquid containing uranium was accidentally spilled into the ground and a nearby rivers at one of its plants in southeastern France
Been removed maybe from the secretive side of Eurpope?
A Simple Statement On Nuclear Power and Climate Change
We're getting a little tired hearing nuclear industry lobbyists and pro-nuclear politicians allege that environmentalists are now supporting nuclear power as a means of addressing the climate crisis.
We know that's not true, and we're sure you do too. In fact, using nuclear power would be counterproductive at reducing carbon emissions.
As Amory Lovins of Rocky Mountain Institute points out, "every dollar invested in nuclear expansion will worsen climate change by buying less solution per dollar..."
The simple statement below will be sent to the media and politicians whenever they misstate the facts.
We hope you and your organization will join us and sign on in support here.
"We do not support construction of new nuclear reactors as a means of addressing the climate crisis. Available renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies are faster, cheaper, safer and cleaner strategies for reducing greenhouse emissions than nuclear power."
Please click the link below and sign the petition:
http://www.nirs.org/petition2/index.php?r=sb
We know that's not true, and we're sure you do too. In fact, using nuclear power would be counterproductive at reducing carbon emissions.
As Amory Lovins of Rocky Mountain Institute points out, "every dollar invested in nuclear expansion will worsen climate change by buying less solution per dollar..."
The simple statement below will be sent to the media and politicians whenever they misstate the facts.
We hope you and your organization will join us and sign on in support here.
"We do not support construction of new nuclear reactors as a means of addressing the climate crisis. Available renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies are faster, cheaper, safer and cleaner strategies for reducing greenhouse emissions than nuclear power."
Please click the link below and sign the petition:
http://www.nirs.org/petition2/index.php?r=sb
Chernobyl
Anti-Nuke Blogs
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(1)
- ► 06/26 - 07/03 (1)
-
►
2010
(5)
- ► 08/15 - 08/22 (1)
- ► 06/27 - 07/04 (4)
-
►
2009
(37)
- ► 10/25 - 11/01 (3)
- ► 10/18 - 10/25 (5)
- ► 10/11 - 10/18 (7)
- ► 10/04 - 10/11 (6)
- ► 09/27 - 10/04 (11)
- ► 09/20 - 09/27 (5)
Posts
